At the forum on September 30th one of the questions posed to the candidates was: Sports Fees have reached the level where they have become a barrier to some students participating. Would you vote to reduce them? Why or Why Not?
The question is silly to me, no one wants sport fees. No one on the current School Committee wants sports fees. No one in the Athletic Department wants sports fees. In a Utopian society there would be no sports fees. You can vote to reduce them but where does the money come from? Do we fire a teacher? Incur a lawsuit because a Sped mandate is ignored? A better question would have been: In light of the economy requiring the Athletic Department to charge sports fees how would you help students overcome this hurdle to expand their participation in sports. I found the candidate responses disheartening.
Mr Deroche doesn’t want sports fees because he didn’t have to pay any when he played sports in High School. There were a lot of things that were different when we were in High School. That’s not a basis for how things need to be done today, in today’s economy and reflecting today’s needs.
Mr Sierpina wishes there were a split between what the student pays and what the school pays. This split already exists. In sitting at the budget meetings I listened to former Athletic Director Peter Shanahan discuss how he needed to use the sports fees to close the gap in his budget between what it costs to run the athletics program and what he receives in dollars from the School Department.
Ms Hetel wants the fees to be affordable. She sited a young man who complained about paying $800 to play hockey. That $800 is misleading. Hockey is the most expensive sport to play that is available for our students but the maximum in sports fees he could pay for that sport is $525 – expensive but far less than the $800 stated. Individual sport fees for sports that require busing are $275 with an additional $250 possible for hockey because of the exorbitant cost of rink fees. The city charges the school department a reduced rate for ice time. I’m sure that young man mentioned above has had to purchase equipment for himself along the way but the equipment is then his to keep.
Sports fees are also reduced or eliminated for students who qualify. There is a form available on the HHS website and I am sure they have print forms as well. The various booster clubs host fundraisers already to reduce sports fees for the students. A concert over the summer at Haverhill Stadium is just one recent example of the community working for our students.
A comment was made about students who play multiple sports. There is a per child max sports fee for the year of $600 and a per family max of $800. This is explained on the parent permission form all students must have completed before they can play any sport.
We talk a lot about sports fees and how unfair they are but the reality is playing any sport is expensive. When you factor in maintenance of the playing area, equipment, uniforms, coaches and busing the price tag rises quickly. What I’ve often wondered is why it took so long to institute these fees in the first place! We forget that every extracurricular activity the students undertake costs money. Band kids have been paying fees for years. They own or rent their instruments at their own expense, band also requires uniforms and travel expenses. Being a member of the National Honor Society requires dues be paid. Theatre students scour yard sales and thrift shops to make their own costumes and props. Unfortunately these students are often overlooked because society considers sports a right of passage for young people but other extracurricular activities as a privilege. Sports fees are merely leveling the playing field of financial burden.